header-logo header-logo

27 May 2010
Issue: 7419 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Pupillage to be more richly rewarded

The minimum annual award for pupillage should be raised from £10,000 to £12,000.

The minimum annual award for pupillage should be raised from £10,000 to £12,000.

The pupillage review report—part of a wider three-part Bar review into education for practice at the Bar—found the existing minimum award is too low.  The report, published last week, is the culmination of a review process which began in October 2008. It made 95 conclusions and recommendations.These include that regulations and guidance regarding pupillage be clarified in a new handbook, that each approved training organisation should appoint a director of pupil training to oversee pupillage, and that training supervisors should attend a refresher training course every five years. Procedures for dealing with complaints should be more widely publicised.

However, the review found that pupillage is the best way to train for the Bar, and there are no plans to change its fundamental nature. The report acknowledged that some adaptation may be necessary to take account of the new ways in which barristers may practise as a result of the Legal Services Act, but emphasised that quality need not suffer.
Derek Wood QC, who led the review, says: “It is essential that the Bar modernises its approach to pupillage.

“While there is a lot to be commended in the present system, it also presents challenges in the extent to which it meets modern expectations for a properly supervised system of vocational training and preparation for practice.”

 

Issue: 7419 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll