header-logo header-logo

27 May 2010
Issue: 7419 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Pupillage to be more richly rewarded

The minimum annual award for pupillage should be raised from £10,000 to £12,000.

The minimum annual award for pupillage should be raised from £10,000 to £12,000.

The pupillage review report—part of a wider three-part Bar review into education for practice at the Bar—found the existing minimum award is too low.  The report, published last week, is the culmination of a review process which began in October 2008. It made 95 conclusions and recommendations.These include that regulations and guidance regarding pupillage be clarified in a new handbook, that each approved training organisation should appoint a director of pupil training to oversee pupillage, and that training supervisors should attend a refresher training course every five years. Procedures for dealing with complaints should be more widely publicised.

However, the review found that pupillage is the best way to train for the Bar, and there are no plans to change its fundamental nature. The report acknowledged that some adaptation may be necessary to take account of the new ways in which barristers may practise as a result of the Legal Services Act, but emphasised that quality need not suffer.
Derek Wood QC, who led the review, says: “It is essential that the Bar modernises its approach to pupillage.

“While there is a lot to be commended in the present system, it also presents challenges in the extent to which it meets modern expectations for a properly supervised system of vocational training and preparation for practice.”

 

Issue: 7419 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll