header-logo header-logo

Pupillage to be more richly rewarded

27 May 2010
Issue: 7419 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The minimum annual award for pupillage should be raised from £10,000 to £12,000.

The minimum annual award for pupillage should be raised from £10,000 to £12,000.

The pupillage review report—part of a wider three-part Bar review into education for practice at the Bar—found the existing minimum award is too low.  The report, published last week, is the culmination of a review process which began in October 2008. It made 95 conclusions and recommendations.These include that regulations and guidance regarding pupillage be clarified in a new handbook, that each approved training organisation should appoint a director of pupil training to oversee pupillage, and that training supervisors should attend a refresher training course every five years. Procedures for dealing with complaints should be more widely publicised.

However, the review found that pupillage is the best way to train for the Bar, and there are no plans to change its fundamental nature. The report acknowledged that some adaptation may be necessary to take account of the new ways in which barristers may practise as a result of the Legal Services Act, but emphasised that quality need not suffer.
Derek Wood QC, who led the review, says: “It is essential that the Bar modernises its approach to pupillage.

“While there is a lot to be commended in the present system, it also presents challenges in the extent to which it meets modern expectations for a properly supervised system of vocational training and preparation for practice.”

 

Issue: 7419 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll