header-logo header-logo

27 January 2021
Issue: 7918 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Training & education
printer mail-detail

Pupils on the bench

Barrister pupils have been given a chance to hear commercial court advocacy from the perspective of the bench, in a judge-run initiative.

Mrs Justice Cockerill, head of the Commercial Court, set the scheme up with the help of Combar, listing staff and her clerk pulling together hearings and identifying any potential conflicts.

‘The bench is so long I can sit with a pupil on one side and my judicial assistant on the other, all properly socially distanced,’ Cockerill J said. She hopes some of the pupils will go on to apply to become judicial assistants, an opportunity also open to solicitors and academics.

During this week (25 January), a different pupil was able to attend each day of a live trial.

William Moody, 24, started his pupillage at Henderson Chambers last September. Apart from two online hearings, his day with Mr Justice Henshaw before Christmas was the first time he had been in court for a hearing.

‘It felt quite extravagant being elevated directly from pupillage to High Court judge,’ he says. ‘What jumped out at me was the truth in the saying that the judge can ‘see everything’ from the bench: every yawn, every stretch, every nervous glance - I could see it, and I am certain the judge could see it too. 

‘Pupillage has been especially challenging, given a large chunk of the training - around advocacy, client handling, working in a team - is nearly impossible to attain. Having the bench eye view and seeing legal teams interact in front of you was invaluable.’

University professor Eirik Bjorge, 37, is doing his pupillage at Brick Court Chambers. He had only participated in remote hearings before spending a day in court with Mr Justice Foxton.

‘I was extremely well looked after and particularly enjoyed the contract law discussions with the judge and his judicial assistant, who was, co-incidentally, a former student of mine,’ he says.

‘There is no doubt that, seeing things, down to the smallest practicalities, from the judge’s perspective, helps you to be a more effective advocate.’

Issue: 7918 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Training & education
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll