header-logo header-logo

Pupils on the bench

27 January 2021
Issue: 7918 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Training & education
printer mail-detail
Barrister pupils have been given a chance to hear commercial court advocacy from the perspective of the bench, in a judge-run initiative.

Mrs Justice Cockerill, head of the Commercial Court, set the scheme up with the help of Combar, listing staff and her clerk pulling together hearings and identifying any potential conflicts.

‘The bench is so long I can sit with a pupil on one side and my judicial assistant on the other, all properly socially distanced,’ Cockerill J said. She hopes some of the pupils will go on to apply to become judicial assistants, an opportunity also open to solicitors and academics.

During this week (25 January), a different pupil was able to attend each day of a live trial.

William Moody, 24, started his pupillage at Henderson Chambers last September. Apart from two online hearings, his day with Mr Justice Henshaw before Christmas was the first time he had been in court for a hearing.

‘It felt quite extravagant being elevated directly from pupillage to High Court judge,’ he says. ‘What jumped out at me was the truth in the saying that the judge can ‘see everything’ from the bench: every yawn, every stretch, every nervous glance - I could see it, and I am certain the judge could see it too. 

‘Pupillage has been especially challenging, given a large chunk of the training - around advocacy, client handling, working in a team - is nearly impossible to attain. Having the bench eye view and seeing legal teams interact in front of you was invaluable.’

University professor Eirik Bjorge, 37, is doing his pupillage at Brick Court Chambers. He had only participated in remote hearings before spending a day in court with Mr Justice Foxton.

‘I was extremely well looked after and particularly enjoyed the contract law discussions with the judge and his judicial assistant, who was, co-incidentally, a former student of mine,’ he says.

‘There is no doubt that, seeing things, down to the smallest practicalities, from the judge’s perspective, helps you to be a more effective advocate.’

Issue: 7918 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Training & education
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll