header-logo header-logo

16 July 2009 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7378 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Put to rights

Roger Smith on the rights & wrongs of human rights

Lord Steyn is one of the big beasts of the UK’s legal jungle. He played a key role in assimilating the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) into domestic law after the coming into force of the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998). In 2003, he delivered one of the great judicial lectures: Guantanamo Bay: a legal black hole. He recently went back into action on identity cards.

Any speechwriter would find it hard to return to the heights of the Guantanamo speech. It was the right subject, from the right author, at the right time. He progressed through US wartime litigation over Japanese internees, the post-war growth of the human rights movement, the impeachment of the First Earl of Clarendon in 1667 to arrive at the problems facing the US courts in asserting jurisdiction over prisoners in Guantanamo Bay. It was judicial; it was historical; it dealt with the jurisprudence: it was devastating.

Identity cards, however, exist in a political black hole—rather

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll