header-logo header-logo

16 July 2025
Issue: 8125 / Categories: Legal News , Property , Conveyancing
printer mail-detail

Putting an end to chancel searches?

The Law Commission has proposed reforms to the rules of chancel repair obligations—a duty on homeowners which adds millions to conveyancing costs each year

The responsibility to repair the chancel (eastern end) of a parish church passed from parish priests to lay landowners after the Reformation and dissolution of the monasteries in the 16th century. All landowners, including of commercial and agricultural property, are potentially affected. Moreover, the liability is personal—not limited to the property value—and several, which means any one landowner can be pursued for the full amount.

Conveyancing searches for chancel repair liability typically add £30-£40 per transaction, which cumulatively add millions of pounds to property sales each year.

The potential risks of chancel repair liability came to the fore in a high-profile case in the 1990s, when a couple, Andrew and Gail Wallbank, were landed with a bill for nearly £187,000 in chancel repairs followed by £250,000 in legal costs, in Aston Cantlow and Wilmcote with Billesley Parochial Church Council v Wallbank [2003] UKHL 37. Consequently, the Land Registration Act 2002 removed the liability as an ‘overriding interest’ from October 2013. However, its legal status remained unclear.

The Law Commission therefore proposes amending the 2002 Act to clarify that purchasers of registered land can only be bound by the liability if it appears on the property title.

Sir Peter Fraser, chair of the Law Commission, said: ‘These proposals aim to deliver the certainty that was intended when the land registration rules changed in 2013.

‘By clarifying the law, the aim is to reduce unnecessary costs for those who buy land such as homebuyers, while ensuring the rules work as Parliament expected.’

The consultation also examines the scope of liability in Wales, which is subject to the Welsh Church Act 1914.

The consultation, ‘Chancel repair liability and registration’, opened this week and ends on 15 November.

Issue: 8125 / Categories: Legal News , Property , Conveyancing
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—James Inness

Sidley—James Inness

Partner joins capital markets team in London office

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Firm announces appointment of partner as UK general counsel

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Firm appoints first chief marketing officer to drive growth strategy

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll