header-logo header-logo

Putting an end to chancel searches?

16 July 2025
Issue: 8125 / Categories: Legal News , Property , Conveyancing
printer mail-detail
The Law Commission has proposed reforms to the rules of chancel repair obligations—a duty on homeowners which adds millions to conveyancing costs each year

The responsibility to repair the chancel (eastern end) of a parish church passed from parish priests to lay landowners after the Reformation and dissolution of the monasteries in the 16th century. All landowners, including of commercial and agricultural property, are potentially affected. Moreover, the liability is personal—not limited to the property value—and several, which means any one landowner can be pursued for the full amount.

Conveyancing searches for chancel repair liability typically add £30-£40 per transaction, which cumulatively add millions of pounds to property sales each year.

The potential risks of chancel repair liability came to the fore in a high-profile case in the 1990s, when a couple, Andrew and Gail Wallbank, were landed with a bill for nearly £187,000 in chancel repairs followed by £250,000 in legal costs, in Aston Cantlow and Wilmcote with Billesley Parochial Church Council v Wallbank [2003] UKHL 37. Consequently, the Land Registration Act 2002 removed the liability as an ‘overriding interest’ from October 2013. However, its legal status remained unclear.

The Law Commission therefore proposes amending the 2002 Act to clarify that purchasers of registered land can only be bound by the liability if it appears on the property title.

Sir Peter Fraser, chair of the Law Commission, said: ‘These proposals aim to deliver the certainty that was intended when the land registration rules changed in 2013.

‘By clarifying the law, the aim is to reduce unnecessary costs for those who buy land such as homebuyers, while ensuring the rules work as Parliament expected.’

The consultation also examines the scope of liability in Wales, which is subject to the Welsh Church Act 1914.

The consultation, ‘Chancel repair liability and registration’, opened this week and ends on 15 November.

Issue: 8125 / Categories: Legal News , Property , Conveyancing
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll