header-logo header-logo

14 August 2015 / Dilpreet K Dhanoa , Andrew Francis
Issue: 7665 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Putting the lights out

nlj_7665_francis

How can developers override private rights of light under s 237 of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990, ask Andrew Francis & Dilpreet K Dhanoa

The world of building development seems to have emerged from the depression caused by the 2008 financial crisis into the broad and sunlit uplands of activity. But, a major inhibition on development can be the presence of private rights asserted against the development site. These can be hard to overcome, and the price to release them and the cost of delay while terms are negotiated may be unacceptable. These rights will include private rights of way, rights of light and restrictive covenants. The first two are more problematic than the third, because the third will usually be within the jurisdiction to discharge, or modify covenants under s 84(1) of the Law of Property Act 1925 conferred on the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) (UTLC). There is no jurisdiction to discharge, or modify easements. The proposals in the Law Commission’s Report and Draft Bill on the reform of easements,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll