header-logo header-logo

24 May 2007
Issue: 7274 / Categories: Features , Costs
printer mail-detail

A question of costs

Karim Ghaly and Victoria Butler-Cole look at the fixed costs regime for low value motor claims

The fixed costs regime set out in  s II of CPR Pt 45 was intended to simplify the recovery of costs in modest road traffic accident (RTA) claims where settlement is achieved without the need for proceedings. Unfortunately, a misapprehension about the effect of the regime has resulted in disputes over the terms of purported compromises, and claims which subsist despite the parties’ belief that  settlement has been achieved.

Section II of CPR Pt 45 prescribes what may be recovered, under CPR 44.12A, in costs-only proceedings arising out of motor claims where the accident occurred on or after 6 October 2003, where the claim settled without the issue of proceedings, and where damages did not exceed £10,000.
To bring proceedings under CPR 44.12A it is necessary that “the parties to a dispute have reached an agreement on all issues (including which party is to pay the costs) which is made

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll