header-logo header-logo

05 November 2025
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan UK LLP has announced the appointment of Andrew Savage as partner in its London office. Formerly with McDermott Will & Emery, where he established and led the London commercial disputes team, Andrew brings extensive experience in international arbitration and high-value cross-border litigation. His practice spans asset management, private equity, financial services, technology, energy and infrastructure sectors, with a strong focus on fraud, corruption, global asset tracing and enforcement.

Andrew has represented leading institutions including Lehman Brothers Finance (in liquidation) and other financial entities in landmark post–credit crunch cases before the High Court and Court of Appeal. He has also appeared in the Supreme Court in notable arbitration matters such as Dallah v Pakistan.

Commenting on his move, Andrew said: ‘Having built a diverse complex international disputes practice, it has become increasingly apparent to me that conflicts at large transactional firms constrain strategy and growth. Quinn Emanuel is a firm I have long admired — its relentless drive to perform at the highest levels resonates strongly with my clients.’

London senior partner Richard East described Andrew as ‘a natural fit for our London office’ with ‘a track record for winning complex, multi-jurisdictional disputes’. Founder and chairman John B. Quinn added: ‘We are only interested in hiring the best disputes lawyers globally and Andrew is firmly in that category. He is an excellent technical lawyer with a material practice and we can’t wait for him to get started.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll