header-logo header-logo

Race at the Bar: action required

10 November 2021
Issue: 7956 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Discrimination
printer mail-detail
Barristers from ethnic minority backgrounds find it harder to secure pupillage and face systemic obstacles throughout their career, according to a report by the Bar Council’s Race Working Group

It found access to the Bar, career progression, the most prestigious and best paying work, retention, and working environment were all influenced by ethnicity and structural discrimination.

A black woman publicly funded criminal junior barrister with the same level of experience as a white male junior would bill on average £18,700 a year less, and an Asian woman £16,400 less. At all levels, white male barristers earned the highest fee income, women earned less than men, and black women earned the least.

Speaking anonymously, barristers reported ‘there is a need to tone down your blackness’; and ‘it can be invaluable for individuals not to be the only person from an ethnic minority background in the room’.

Some 58% of black and Asian women at the Bar had personally experienced bullying and harassment at work or online, four times more than their white male counterparts. Barristers from ethnic minority backgrounds were more likely to be referred to the regulator.

While Asian judges make up 5% of the judiciary, only 1% of judges are black and 2% are from mixed ethnic backgrounds. Some of the six main practice areas have no QCs from ethnic minority backgrounds at all. In England and Wales in total there are only five black/black British female QCs, and 17 black/black British male QCs.

Barbara Mills QC and Simon Regis, co-chairs of the Group, said: ‘Quite rightly, practising barristers within the profession have expressed frustration over the amount of talk about race inequality at the Bar, and the lack of action and failure to bring about change.’

The report, Race at the Bar, made 23 detailed recommendations, on access, retention, progression and Bar culture. Recommended actions included measures on training, monitoring of work distribution, targeted career support, sponsorship and mentoring.

Issue: 7956 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Discrimination
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll