header-logo header-logo

Racing pundit McCririck was "unpalatable"

15 November 2013
Issue: 7585 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Employment tribunal rules in favour of Channel 4

Channel 4 racing stalwart John McCririck has lost his age discrimination claim against the station.

McCririck, 73 years old, claimed he was dropped from his presenting job on Channel 4 Racing because of his age, contrary to the Equality Act 2010. Channel 4 said they wanted to change the style and tone of their racing coverage to appeal to a wider audience. McCririck, who is famed for his pantomime chauvinism, hairy whiskers and deerstalker hats, did not fit with this style and put off many viewers, it said. 

However, McCririck said Channel 4 had never asked him to tone his character down, and had not consulted him about the new programme.

Central London employment tribunal unanimously held that the channel had demonstrated a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.

Delivering their judgment, the tribunal panel said: “The tribunal have taken into account that the evidence in this case is that the aim was to bring horse-racing to a wider audience.

“All the evidence is that Mr McCririck's pantomime persona, as demonstrated on the celebrity television appearances, and his persona when appearing on Channel 4 Racing, together with his self-described bigoted and male chauvinist views were clearly unpalatable to a wide potential audience."

 

Issue: 7585 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll