header-logo header-logo

15 November 2013
Issue: 7585 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Racing pundit McCririck was "unpalatable"

Employment tribunal rules in favour of Channel 4

Channel 4 racing stalwart John McCririck has lost his age discrimination claim against the station.

McCririck, 73 years old, claimed he was dropped from his presenting job on Channel 4 Racing because of his age, contrary to the Equality Act 2010. Channel 4 said they wanted to change the style and tone of their racing coverage to appeal to a wider audience. McCririck, who is famed for his pantomime chauvinism, hairy whiskers and deerstalker hats, did not fit with this style and put off many viewers, it said. 

However, McCririck said Channel 4 had never asked him to tone his character down, and had not consulted him about the new programme.

Central London employment tribunal unanimously held that the channel had demonstrated a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.

Delivering their judgment, the tribunal panel said: “The tribunal have taken into account that the evidence in this case is that the aim was to bring horse-racing to a wider audience.

“All the evidence is that Mr McCririck's pantomime persona, as demonstrated on the celebrity television appearances, and his persona when appearing on Channel 4 Racing, together with his self-described bigoted and male chauvinist views were clearly unpalatable to a wide potential audience."

 

Issue: 7585 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers to be joined by leading family law set, 4 Brick Court, this summer

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll