header-logo header-logo

09 July 2009
Issue: 7377 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

Radmacher offers hope on pre-nups

German heiress divorce may have “decisive” impact on UK family law

Pre-nuptial agreements could enter the “mainstream” of UK family law following the Court of Appeal’s finding in Radmacher, say family lawyers.
In Radmacher v Granatino [2009] EWCA Civ 649, the court ruled that a pre-nup could be “decisive” in the divorce of wealthy German heiress, Katrin Radmacher, who is said to be worth £100m, and her French husband, Nicolas Gramatino.

The husband’s initial divorce award of £5.4m was reduced to a one-off lump sum of £1m plus a loan for the cost of a home, which must be repaid when the youngest child reaches 22.

Sarah Anticoni, a partner in the family team at Charles Russell, says: “Until now pre-marital agreements have not been legally binding in England. However, the future of these agreements is not set in stone and, in the short term at least, their impact will lie with other judges who are asked to decide similar cases. 

“This decision should be the catalyst for Parliament and the Law Commission to take up the baton. The profession have been clamouring for reform for years but no statutory change has been forthcoming as it is not seen as a vote winner. 

“This decision is particularly important for non-English couples who have entered into pre-marital agreements overseas before they marry. It demonstrates that the English court is going to be far less willing to interfere with such agreements in the future.”

Zoe Bagg, senior associate, McGuireWoods, says: “Many of our clients come from civil law jurisdictions where pre-nuptials (or other protection of assets under the civil code) are commonplace.

“This is a progressive move towards the harmonisation of laws in Europe in this area and will hopefully give encouragement to those working towards the harmonisation of European succession laws.”

Christina Blacklaws, senior partner of London family law firm Blacklaws Davis, says: “We are still a little way off knowing whether the ruling will be upheld. Mr Granatino is said to be considering appealing to the House of Lords. However, this is a very significant movement in favour of pre-nuptial agreements and one which will be welcomed by many middle-income families, for whom it has enormous potential significance.”

 

Issue: 7377 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll