header-logo header-logo

09 July 2009
Issue: 7377 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

Radmacher offers hope on pre-nups

German heiress divorce may have “decisive” impact on UK family law

Pre-nuptial agreements could enter the “mainstream” of UK family law following the Court of Appeal’s finding in Radmacher, say family lawyers.
In Radmacher v Granatino [2009] EWCA Civ 649, the court ruled that a pre-nup could be “decisive” in the divorce of wealthy German heiress, Katrin Radmacher, who is said to be worth £100m, and her French husband, Nicolas Gramatino.

The husband’s initial divorce award of £5.4m was reduced to a one-off lump sum of £1m plus a loan for the cost of a home, which must be repaid when the youngest child reaches 22.

Sarah Anticoni, a partner in the family team at Charles Russell, says: “Until now pre-marital agreements have not been legally binding in England. However, the future of these agreements is not set in stone and, in the short term at least, their impact will lie with other judges who are asked to decide similar cases. 

“This decision should be the catalyst for Parliament and the Law Commission to take up the baton. The profession have been clamouring for reform for years but no statutory change has been forthcoming as it is not seen as a vote winner. 

“This decision is particularly important for non-English couples who have entered into pre-marital agreements overseas before they marry. It demonstrates that the English court is going to be far less willing to interfere with such agreements in the future.”

Zoe Bagg, senior associate, McGuireWoods, says: “Many of our clients come from civil law jurisdictions where pre-nuptials (or other protection of assets under the civil code) are commonplace.

“This is a progressive move towards the harmonisation of laws in Europe in this area and will hopefully give encouragement to those working towards the harmonisation of European succession laws.”

Christina Blacklaws, senior partner of London family law firm Blacklaws Davis, says: “We are still a little way off knowing whether the ruling will be upheld. Mr Granatino is said to be considering appealing to the House of Lords. However, this is a very significant movement in favour of pre-nuptial agreements and one which will be welcomed by many middle-income families, for whom it has enormous potential significance.”

 

Issue: 7377 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll