header-logo header-logo

19 June 2008
Issue: 7326 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Costs
printer mail-detail

Raising the roof

In brief

Roof repair charges put forward by Westminster City Council-owned City- West Homes to the lessees of two residential blocks in Marylebone have been branded “astronomically high” by the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal (LVT). The lessees formed an action group to fight the charges proposed by City- West Homes which it says amounted to £418 to tarmac each sq metre of the roof—compared to a private contractor’s quoted costs of around £100 per sq metre. The tribunal ruled that the costs of the work were unreasonable, that it was unnecessary to carry out the works on this scale, and that they should have carried out the smaller scale repairs suggested by the lessees’ expert surveyor.

Issue: 7326 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Costs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

mfg Solicitors—Hayley Pearce & Lauren Williams

mfg Solicitors—Hayley Pearce & Lauren Williams

Law firm mfg Solicitors announces promotions at Ludlow office

Womble Bond Dickinson—Richard Sharpe

Womble Bond Dickinson—Richard Sharpe

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints partner in Leeds residential team

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners adds six to partnership in record year for partner promotions

NEWS
The legal profession's AI challenge extends far beyond fabricated case citations, according to a warning about the next phase of technological risk
Law firms should use the transition period before the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) assumes anti-money laundering (AML) supervision to strengthen governance and compliance, experts have warned
Cross-border disputes increasingly demand creative approaches to gathering evidence, with litigators needing to look beyond traditional letters of request
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified the distinction between contracts of 'indefinite' and 'perpetual' duration, with potentially significant implications for commercial drafting
The Court of Appeal was entitled to uphold the government's decision to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation, according to an analysis of the ruling
back-to-top-scroll