header-logo header-logo

01 February 2021
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Diversity
printer mail-detail

Raising the Bar on diversity

The Bar has become marginally more diverse, according to the annual Bar Standards Board (BSB) report

Figures for the 2020 BSB diversity report, published this week, showed encouraging results among the most recent entrants to the Bar―the percentages of male and female pupil barristers in December 2020 were equal. Moreover, the proportion of pupils from minority ethnic backgrounds rose 3.7% to 22.9% of the whole, which is the highest number yet and the largest year on year increase in this statistic since records began in 2015.

At the other end of the spectrum, the figures on Queen’s Counsel revealed a 0.7% increase in minority ethnic silks to 8.8% of QCs, and a 0.6% rise in female QCs to 16.8%.

At the practising Bar as a whole, the report found men continue to outnumber women (60.9% compared to 38.2% in December 2020).

The percentage of barristers from minority ethnic groups rose 0.5% to 14.1% (slightly higher than the estimated 13.3% of the working age population who are from ethnic minority groups).

A closer look at this data reveals Asian/ Asian British barristers made up 7.5% of the practising Bar (an increase of 0.3% on the previous year) compared to 5.6% of the working age population.

Black/Black British barristers accounted for 3.2% of the practising Bar (an increase of 0.05%) compared to 3.4% of the working age population.

Barristers from a Mixed/Multiple ethnic background made up 3.3%, compared to 1.5% of the working age population.

On disability status, only 56.9% of respondents provided this information, with 6.3% disclosing a disability. This compares with 11.3% of disabled people in the employed working age UK population as a whole.

BSB head of equality and access to justice, Amit Popat said: ‘While we are pleased to see that the Bar is increasingly diverse, there is still more work to be done to make the profession truly representative of society.

‘We are currently reviewing our Equality Rules, have published an anti-racist statement for barristers and chambers, and recently launched a pilot race equality reverse mentoring scheme to address cultural barriers to equality at the Bar.’

The full Diversity at the Bar report 2020 is available at: bit.ly/3aa4XQW.

Categories: Legal News , Profession , Diversity
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll