header-logo header-logo

24 January 2019 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 7825 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Rallying round the flag

What laws still govern the desecration of national symbols? Athelstane Aamodt takes a vexillological tour around the world

 

Last November, the Spanish comedian Dani Mateo appeared in court in Spain after blowing his nose on the Spanish flag during a comedy sketch on television, leading to a complaint from the National Police Union that he had committed the crime of ‘publicly offending Spanish symbols’. It seems odd at first glance that a modern European liberal democracy should have laws about such things, but it turns out that there are all sorts of rules around Europe that apply to the desecration of flags and national symbols.

European standards

The United Kingdom has no specific laws that prohibit the denigration of the ostensible national flag, the Union Jack (or the ‘Union Flag’ to vexillology pedants). Indeed, perhaps one of the worst things in the mind of the populace that one can do with the Union Jack is to hang it upside down, which happens more often than one would imagine.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

London corporate and commercial team announces partner appointment

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Firm names partner as London office managing partner

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Firm appoints new head of criminal litigation team

NEWS
Personal injury lawyers have welcomed a government U-turn on a ‘substantial prejudice’ defence that risked enabling defendants in child sexual abuse civil cases to have proceedings against them dropped
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll