header-logo header-logo

24 January 2019 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 7825 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Rallying round the flag

What laws still govern the desecration of national symbols? Athelstane Aamodt takes a vexillological tour around the world

 

Last November, the Spanish comedian Dani Mateo appeared in court in Spain after blowing his nose on the Spanish flag during a comedy sketch on television, leading to a complaint from the National Police Union that he had committed the crime of ‘publicly offending Spanish symbols’. It seems odd at first glance that a modern European liberal democracy should have laws about such things, but it turns out that there are all sorts of rules around Europe that apply to the desecration of flags and national symbols.

European standards

The United Kingdom has no specific laws that prohibit the denigration of the ostensible national flag, the Union Jack (or the ‘Union Flag’ to vexillology pedants). Indeed, perhaps one of the worst things in the mind of the populace that one can do with the Union Jack is to hang it upside down, which happens more often than one would imagine.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll