header-logo header-logo

24 January 2019 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 7825 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Rallying round the flag

What laws still govern the desecration of national symbols? Athelstane Aamodt takes a vexillological tour around the world

 

Last November, the Spanish comedian Dani Mateo appeared in court in Spain after blowing his nose on the Spanish flag during a comedy sketch on television, leading to a complaint from the National Police Union that he had committed the crime of ‘publicly offending Spanish symbols’. It seems odd at first glance that a modern European liberal democracy should have laws about such things, but it turns out that there are all sorts of rules around Europe that apply to the desecration of flags and national symbols.

European standards

The United Kingdom has no specific laws that prohibit the denigration of the ostensible national flag, the Union Jack (or the ‘Union Flag’ to vexillology pedants). Indeed, perhaps one of the worst things in the mind of the populace that one can do with the Union Jack is to hang it upside down, which happens more often than one would imagine.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll