header-logo header-logo

Rat infestations, incompatible IT & lengthy delays

21 July 2025
Categories: Legal News , Profession , In Court
printer mail-detail
MPs have called for an ‘urgent and comprehensive, root-and-branch’ review’ of the ‘dysfunctional’ county court system, to be launched by next spring at the latest

The cross-party Justice Committee published a devastating report this week, 'Work of the county court', highlighting the ‘unacceptable and increasing delays across nearly all types of claims. Ministry of Justice statistics for the quarter to March 2025 show an average wait of almost 50 weeks from issue to trial for small claims, and nearly 75 weeks for fast, intermediate and multi-track claims.

Rats, flies, rotting pigeons and leaky roofs featured among a list of building hazards encountered by judges, lawyers and other court users. At South Shields the courtroom ceiling collapsed, while at Leeds the heating was jammed on during the heatwave of 2022.

The MPs criticised the decade-long Reform modernisation programme which ‘under-delivered’, resulting in a multitude of incompatible systems and outdated paper-based processes. They expressed specific concern about the cost and delays caused by the need to lug heavy paper files around the country. They recommended, instead, that a single case management system be introduced and future digital reforms be co-designed with users and rolled out only when proven reliable.

Block listing, where multiple cases are scheduled for a specific time slot, also came under fire for leaving court users waiting around for their case to be called, out of pocket for their day’s earnings while incurring travel and legal expenses. The committee recommended litigants be able to recover their legal, travel and subsistence costs if their case is listed but not heard.

It is difficult to contact the individual courts—some did not answer their phones while others could only have messages passed to them through a central inquiry line. Callers were sometimes asked to put their question in an email and warned it could be 10-12 weeks before the email is opened. The committee recommended there be a clear point of contact and allocated claims handlers.

Andy Slaughter MP, the committee’s chair, said the county court was ‘beset by unacceptable delays, recruitment and retention issues across frontline staff and the judiciary, and a complex “patchwork” of paper-based and digital systems… It is not tenable to continue without fundamental reform’.

Law Society president Richard Atkinson said: ‘If the government properly funded our courts and those who work in them, thousands of people would be freed from the legal limbo caused by long waits.’

Categories: Legal News , Profession , In Court
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll