What constitutes a ‘good reason’ to depart from a costs budget? Simon Gibbs examines the evidence
- In Barts Health NHS Trust v Salmon the judge held that the failure to complete a phase was a ‘good reason’ to depart from the budget.
We are now starting to see an increasing number of decisions coming through as to what amounts to a ‘good reason’ to depart from a costs management order.
The decision in Barts Health NHS Trust v Salmon [2019] Lexis Citation 27 makes for particularly interesting reading.
This was a clinical negligence case. A costs management order had been made approving the claimant’s budget in the sum of £155,673. The claim settled before trial and where not all the phases of the original budget had been completed.
The claimant served a bill of costs where the costs claimed for a number of the phases were less than the amounts allowed in the approved budget for the corresponding phases.
For example, in respect of the experts
.tmb-mov69x69.png?sfvrsn=9a8f1ea9_1)
