header-logo header-logo

19 October 2012 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7534 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Reading between the lines

Roger Smith peruses the legal stories hitting the headlines

Chris Grayling, the new Lord Chancellor, had the difficult task of restricting Boris Johnson’s front page coverage at the Conservative Party conference. He succeeded, falling back on a conference standard—householders’ rights against intruders.

Interviewed on BBC television, Grayling admitted that these cases were “relatively rare”. He was also a bit vague on how far his proposals would go in allowing the use of disproportionate force by a householder. In particular, he declined to comment on the application of his proposed law on cases like Munir Hussain. This was a little surprising since he got considerable publicity in December 2009 for bringing up the proposal in the context of that case. Hussain and his brother chased an intruder down the street and beat him with a cricket bat and a metal pole so severely that he had permanent brain damage and was found unfit to plead on the charge of burglary. They were given custodial sentences. Grayling’s instructions were clearly to repeat the mantra of “raising the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll