header-logo header-logo

19 October 2012 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7534 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Reading between the lines

Roger Smith peruses the legal stories hitting the headlines

Chris Grayling, the new Lord Chancellor, had the difficult task of restricting Boris Johnson’s front page coverage at the Conservative Party conference. He succeeded, falling back on a conference standard—householders’ rights against intruders.

Interviewed on BBC television, Grayling admitted that these cases were “relatively rare”. He was also a bit vague on how far his proposals would go in allowing the use of disproportionate force by a householder. In particular, he declined to comment on the application of his proposed law on cases like Munir Hussain. This was a little surprising since he got considerable publicity in December 2009 for bringing up the proposal in the context of that case. Hussain and his brother chased an intruder down the street and beat him with a cricket bat and a metal pole so severely that he had permanent brain damage and was found unfit to plead on the charge of burglary. They were given custodial sentences. Grayling’s instructions were clearly to repeat the mantra of “raising the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll