header-logo header-logo

08 January 2010 / Geraldine Morris
Issue: 7399 / Categories: Features , Mediation , Family
printer mail-detail

Ready for take off

Geraldine Morris debunks some mediation myths & says it’s time for some creative thinking

As we come to the end of the current decade it is notable that the options for resolving issues on relationship breakdown have significantly widened. In the nineties the majority of family lawyers only had two methods of dispute resolution available to them—negotiation and court proceedings.

Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) has entered the mainstream to the extent that there is now discussion as to whether it should be called “alternative” at all. But is the original form of ADR—mediation—being eroded by the newer form of collaborative law?

A relative newcomer to the ADR arena, collaborative law was given a significant boost recently when the Legal Services Board confirmed that it would be incorporated into the family specification with effect from October 2010.

Mediation has been compulsory for clients seeking public funding for some time but may not always be appropriate because of, for example, domestic violence or because the non-publically funded party won’t attend mediation.

Mediation myths

Mediation

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll