header-logo header-logo

14 July 2020 / Mark Pawlowski
Issue: 7895 / Categories: Features , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-detail

Reasonable doubt & the movies

24172
Mark Pawlowski looks at the meaning of reasonable doubt against the backdrop of one of the most iconic Hollywood films depicting jury trial

In Twelve Angry Men (1957), acclaimed as one of the best films dramatising the imperfections of the jury system, the fate of a teenager accused of the murder of his father rests on the verdict of 12 jurors locked inside a steamy jury room. The evidence seems overwhelming and 11 of the jurors are ready to convict in what they see as an ‘open and shut’ case. Only one brave juror (played by Henry Fonda) refuses to vote and wants to talk about the case. What follows is an intense examination of the prejudices that each juror member brings to the jury room.

Fonda’s character is the great unifier throughout the film seeking to dispel bias and faulty reasoning by demanding that his fellow jurors scrutinise the evidence carefully and come to a reasoned verdict. Critics of the jury system say that it works against justice

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

Ward Hadaway—Mike Gore

Ward Hadaway—Mike Gore

Firm enhances advisory capability with strategic risk specialist hire

Stewarts—Alexandra Lyons

Stewarts—Alexandra Lyons

Insurance and reinsurance specialist joins policyholder disputes practice as partner

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll