header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
24 May 2007
Issue: 7274 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Reasonably onerous

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Helen Hart and Nicola Rüütel examine how the phrase “reasonable endeavours” has been interpreted

Reasonable endeavours: one of contract lawyers’ favourite phrases. It will often be used where the parties cannot or do not want to agree a specific obligation and to finalise and sign the contract as quickly as possible. Yet it should not be used lightly. Where any expression is used in a contract it must be read and interpreted in the context of the obligations and circumstances in question, but sometimes the expression will be given a specific meaning by the courts.

There have been various cases considering the use of the phrases “reasonable endeavours” and “best endeavours” culminating in Rhodia International Holdings Ltd v Huntsman International LLC [2007] EWHC 292 (Comm), [2007] All ER (D) 264 (Feb) and Yewbelle Ltd v London Green Developments Ltd & Knightsbridge Green Ltd [2006] EWHC 3166 (Ch), [2006] All ER (D) 122 (Dec).

BEST v REASONABLE

An obligation to use best endeavours generally requires the person giving the undertaking to take those steps which a prudent and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
NLJ this week: Diamond rings and broken promises

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

NLJ this week: The battle over medical report fees intensifies
Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll