header-logo header-logo

30 May 2014 / Guy Skelton
Issue: 7608 / Categories: Features , E-disclosure
printer mail-detail

Rebooting disclosure

web_skelton

Lawyers must get to grips with the brave new world of e-disclosure, says Guy Skelton

For many litigators, the word “disclosure” conjures up an image of a darkened room filled with towering piles of paper. However, technological advances and changes in practice accelerated by the Jackson reforms mean bleary-eyed support teams are being replaced by tech-savvy analysts, while towers of servers stand in place of the highlighter-strewn papers. Although every lawyer will agree that efficiency is to be welcomed, how can lawyers and firms get to grips with the brave new world of e-disclosure?

 

Understanding e-disclosure

Despite the addition of the ultra-modern “e”, e-disclosure is no different to paper disclosure in terms of the duties owed by solicitors to the court. The creation of the e-disclosure regime is simply a recognition from the courts of the changing way in which information is transmitted and stored. However, because of the sheer volume of information stored electronically, the e-disclosure regime does create additional challenges for lawyers in terms of managing and assessing the mountains of data.

Timing

Timing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll