header-logo header-logo

19 March 2009 / Malcolm Dowden , Elinor Clark
Issue: 7361 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

A recipe for litigation?

Is it safe to complete on the basis of an undertaking? ask Malcolm Dowden & Elinor Clark

* * * * * *

A solicitor who has given an undertaking is obliged to comply with it. If that undertaking is to redeem and discharge a mortgage, the solicitor must secure that result, even if the sale proceeds are insufficient.

Risk of giving an undertaking

Angel Solicitors v Jenkins O'Dowd & Barth [2009] EWHC 46 (Ch), [2009] All ER (D) 133 (Jan) demonstrates the dangers that arise where a seller's solicitor gives an undertaking to redeem and discharge an “all moneys” charge without first obtaining a redemption statement, and securing the lender's agreement to release the property on payment of a specified sum.

The seller's solicitor had proceeded (without checking) on the pre-credit crunch assumption that the lender would be willing to accept 70% of the proceeds of sale of a property to discharge an all-moneys charge. In fact, after completion, the lender agreed to discharge the property only on payment of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll