header-logo header-logo

For the record

05 August 2010 / Robert Males
Issue: 7429 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

Robert Males provides some tips on negotiating costs recovery

Time recording is important in two distinct ways. It is, of course, relevant if that is the charging basis upon which work is carried out and in terms of the recovery of costs from another party whether through negotiation and settlement or through assessment by the court that the time spent is a significant factor.

The other relevance to the time spent in dealing with the matter is for the practice to understand what resources are being used to conduct any particular case. It is vital for the good running and management of a solicitor’s practice to understand how long any particular piece of work takes and that information can be used to assess proper workloads, the need for additional members of staff and the correct pricing of particular pieces of work.

Time is not, however, the only basis upon which solicitors are entitled to charge their client; such issues as the importance and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll