header-logo header-logo

04 April 2023
Issue: 8020 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Child law , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Record delays in family cases

Private family law children cases took an average of 47 weeks to conclude in the final quarter of 2022—up five weeks on the same period in 2021 and an all-time high, according to the latest family court statistics.

Law Society president Lubna Shuja branded the delays, affecting custody and residence cases involving nearly 19,000 children during the quarter, ‘unacceptable’. Disposal times have been growing worse since 2016, when cases took about 22 weeks on average.

Shuja said: ‘HM Courts & Tribunals Service has previously estimated that it may take three years to return to pre-pandemic levels, which is very worrying, particularly for cases that concern children and family matters. 

‘These delays are preventing parents from being able to see their children and could mean children are left without the stability they need to thrive. The UK government must ensure, so far as possible, that there are sufficient fee-paid and full-time judges to deal with existing and new caseloads.’

The Ministry of Justice figures also show the level of legal representation in the family court, ten years after LASPO (the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012) came into force in April 2013, removing legal aid from most private family cases.

Both sides were unrepresented in 40% of cases in the quarter up to December 2022, up from 17% in January to March 2013. Correspondingly, both sides had legal representation in 18% of cases in the final quarter of 2022, compared to 41% in the first quarter of 2013.

Shuja said: ‘Litigants in person require more time and support from the court, which is likely to slow down the system and increase overall costs. 

‘Early legal advice must be reinstated so families can be supported in the court system. This would also make a cost-effective contribution to resolving the backlogs in the family courts.’

Issue: 8020 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Child law , Procedure & practice
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll