header-logo header-logo

09 October 2008
Issue: 7340 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Redundant procedures?

Employers should think hard before opting to take the redundancy route, says Sarah Boulton-Jones

Redundancy is a potentially fair reason for dismissal. However, unless the employer follows a proper procedure, the dismissal may still be found to be unfair. If an employer proposes to make redundant 20 or more employees within a period of 90 days or less, it is also obliged to follow a collective consultation procedure. This involves consulting with employee representatives about the proposed redundancies before they take effect.
Individual redundancies

Case law over the years has established that the key elements of a fair dismissal by reason of redundancy are:
      ●     a genuine redundancy situation;

      ●     fair selection;

      ●     warning and consultation; and
  
      ●     consideration of suitable alternative employment.

In addition, since the introduction of the statutory dismissal and disciplinary procedures (DDPs) in 2004, a redundancy dismissal is automatically unfair if the DDPs are not followed. The DDPs require an employer considering dismissing an employee to follow the basic procedure outlined below:

      ●     Step 1: The employer must

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll