header-logo header-logo

09 October 2008
Issue: 7340 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Redundant procedures?

Employers should think hard before opting to take the redundancy route, says Sarah Boulton-Jones

Redundancy is a potentially fair reason for dismissal. However, unless the employer follows a proper procedure, the dismissal may still be found to be unfair. If an employer proposes to make redundant 20 or more employees within a period of 90 days or less, it is also obliged to follow a collective consultation procedure. This involves consulting with employee representatives about the proposed redundancies before they take effect.
Individual redundancies

Case law over the years has established that the key elements of a fair dismissal by reason of redundancy are:
      ●     a genuine redundancy situation;

      ●     fair selection;

      ●     warning and consultation; and
  
      ●     consideration of suitable alternative employment.

In addition, since the introduction of the statutory dismissal and disciplinary procedures (DDPs) in 2004, a redundancy dismissal is automatically unfair if the DDPs are not followed. The DDPs require an employer considering dismissing an employee to follow the basic procedure outlined below:

      ●     Step 1: The employer must

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
Can a meticulously maintained spreadsheet turn a couple’s informal financial arrangements into legally enforceable obligations? 
back-to-top-scroll