header-logo header-logo

09 October 2008
Issue: 7340 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Redundant procedures?

Employers should think hard before opting to take the redundancy route, says Sarah Boulton-Jones

Redundancy is a potentially fair reason for dismissal. However, unless the employer follows a proper procedure, the dismissal may still be found to be unfair. If an employer proposes to make redundant 20 or more employees within a period of 90 days or less, it is also obliged to follow a collective consultation procedure. This involves consulting with employee representatives about the proposed redundancies before they take effect.
Individual redundancies

Case law over the years has established that the key elements of a fair dismissal by reason of redundancy are:
      ●     a genuine redundancy situation;

      ●     fair selection;

      ●     warning and consultation; and
  
      ●     consideration of suitable alternative employment.

In addition, since the introduction of the statutory dismissal and disciplinary procedures (DDPs) in 2004, a redundancy dismissal is automatically unfair if the DDPs are not followed. The DDPs require an employer considering dismissing an employee to follow the basic procedure outlined below:

      ●     Step 1: The employer must

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

back-to-top-scroll