header-logo header-logo

Redundant procedures?

09 October 2008
Issue: 7340 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employers should think hard before opting to take the redundancy route, says Sarah Boulton-Jones

Redundancy is a potentially fair reason for dismissal. However, unless the employer follows a proper procedure, the dismissal may still be found to be unfair. If an employer proposes to make redundant 20 or more employees within a period of 90 days or less, it is also obliged to follow a collective consultation procedure. This involves consulting with employee representatives about the proposed redundancies before they take effect.
Individual redundancies

Case law over the years has established that the key elements of a fair dismissal by reason of redundancy are:
      ●     a genuine redundancy situation;

      ●     fair selection;

      ●     warning and consultation; and
  
      ●     consideration of suitable alternative employment.

In addition, since the introduction of the statutory dismissal and disciplinary procedures (DDPs) in 2004, a redundancy dismissal is automatically unfair if the DDPs are not followed. The DDPs require an employer considering dismissing an employee to follow the basic procedure outlined below:

      ●     Step 1: The employer must

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll