header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
10 February 2023 / William Gibson
Issue: 8012 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

Reflections on Beeching: beware the axeman

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
110007
Did Richard Beeching deserve the public vitriol he attracted for the closure of the railways? William Gibson examines the impact of the swingeing 1960s cuts

What do the Transport Act 1962 (effective January 1963) and the Courts Act 1971 have in common? Two things: they were both intended to make improvements by cutting, and the axeman in each case was Richard Beeching.

Beeching in charge

A scientist employed by Imperial Chemical Industries (ICI), he was seconded to the Civil Service for five years from June 1961 to be first chairman of the newly created British Railways Board, following abolition of the British Transport Commission (BTC). His proposed employment was disclosed to Parliament in March 1961 by the Minister of Transport, Ernest Marples. The announcement that he was to be paid a salary of £24,000 (about £470,000 today), which was more than twice as much as the outgoing chairman of the BTC, sparked an angry and extensive debate in the House. Labour opposition members en masse condemned his lack of knowledge

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: No such thing as a ‘Welsh seat’
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
NLJ this week: Jury reform risks justice for efficiency’s sake
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
NLJ this week: Crypto fightback offers ‘new frontier for law’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
NLJ this week: Time to revive the duty to report crime?
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
NLJ this week: When are experts truly ‘necessary’?
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll