header-logo header-logo

02 July 2025
Issue: 8123 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Discrimination , Equality
printer mail-detail

Reform employment law to protect pay

Lawyers have called for mandatory gender pay gap reporting to be extended to cover race and disability when the government brings forward its Equality (Race and Disability) Bill

Responding this week to an Office for Equality and Opportunity call for evidence ahead of the Bill, CILEX president Yanthé Richardson said: ‘Tackling the pay inequality and discrimination that continues to persist in the UK when it comes to race and disability is a priority.

‘Mandatory reporting would not only provide valuable data to highlight where pay disparities are appearing and why, it would also drive behavioural change.’

In its response, CILEX (the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives) recommended stronger penalties for equal pay breaches, and it suggested the government introduce an Independent Equality Pay Enforcement Unit, which could ‘significantly reduce the time and costs of litigation’.

CILEX also called for the Equality and Human Rights Commission to be given powers to enforce ‘strong and immediate sanctions’ for non-compliance. It suggested organisations such as charities and trade unions be able to bring equal pay claims on an employee’s behalf since many workers fear ‘retaliation or victimisation’.

Currently, businesses with at least 250 staff must report their gender pay gap data annually.

Employees can bring an equal pay claim on the basis of gender. If they believe they are paid less due to race or disability, however, they must bring a claim for discrimination, which can be more expensive.

CILEX urged the government to close a gap on combined and dual discrimination in the Equality Act 2010. Section 14 protects individuals from direct discrimination due to a combination of two protected characteristics. However, it has never been brought into force. Consequently, claimants must show their treatment is direct discrimination because of each of the characteristics taken separately, which is more expensive and time-consuming.

Issue: 8123 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Discrimination , Equality
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

back-to-top-scroll