header-logo header-logo

Reforming the Arbitration Act?

01 December 2021
Issue: 7959 / Categories: Legal News , ADR , Arbitration
printer mail-detail
The Law Commission is to launch a major review of the Arbitration Act 1996, the principal legislation governing arbitrations in England, Wales and Northern Ireland

The Commission said it aimed to maintain the attractiveness of England and Wales as a destination for dispute resolution and the pre-eminence of English law as a choice of law. In the past 25 years, rival jurisdictions have enacted more recent legislative reforms.

The scope of the review will be determined in the coming months but it could cover the courts’ powers in support of arbitration proceedings, the procedure for challenging a jurisdiction award and the availability of appeals on points of law. Other possibilities for review include the power to summarily dismiss unmeritorious claims or defences in arbitration proceedings, confidentiality and privacy in arbitration proceedings and electronic service of documents, electronic arbitration awards and virtual hearings.

The Commission also intends, as a separate project, to consider what scope there is for introducing trust law arbitration, alongside wider work on modernising trust law.

Commissioner Professor Sarah Green said: ‘The quality of the Arbitration Act 1996 has helped London become a leading seat for international arbitrations, however, there are some aspects of the Act which could be improved in light of modern arbitration practices.’

The Commission will launch the review during the first quarter of 2022 and aims to publish a consultation paper in late 2022.

Catherine Dixon, Director-General of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators, said: ‘The 1996 Arbitration Act has played a pivotal role in making England, Wales and Northern Ireland a leading global centre for commercial arbitration.

‘While there are different views on whether amendments are required, 25 years on from its enactment, it is right that the legislation is reviewed to ensure the framework it provides remains effective, agile and responsive to the changing landscape of dispute resolution worldwide.’

Issue: 7959 / Categories: Legal News , ADR , Arbitration
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll