header-logo header-logo

Reforms for landlords, renters & homeowners

08 November 2023
Issue: 8048 / Categories: Legal News , Property , Landlord&tenant
printer mail-detail
Lawyers have given a cautious welcome to the inclusion in the King’s Speech of legislation to help leaseholders, with some warning reform will be complex and difficult while others predict little will change

Setting out the government’s legislative priorities for the next 12 months, King Charles announced a Leasehold and Freehold Bill to ban the creation of new leasehold houses and make it cheaper and easier for more leaseholders to: extend their lease, with a standard term of 990 years and zero ground rent for both houses and flats; buy their freehold; and take over management of their building. The rights will apply to leaseholders in buildings with up to 50% non-residential floorspace (such as flats above shops) and leaseholders will no longer have to wait two years before applying.

A Renters (Reform) Bill will also be introduced, abolishing ‘no-fault evictions’, adding mandatory grounds for possession including that the landlord wishes to sell the property or move a family member in, and providing for eviction within two weeks for a breach of the tenancy agreement or damage to the property. The Bill provides for a Private Rented Sector Ombudsman with binding powers to resolve tenancy disputes.

However, Jeremy Raj, head of residential property at Irwin Mitchell, said none of the proposals ‘deal with the fundamental issues troubling the housing market, such as lack of supply, uncertainty regarding future regulation, unsuitable stock for our environmental ambitions and our population profile, and of course the affordability crisis’. Moreover, Raj said the leasehold bill ‘disappoints those of us who have been hoping for many years now for a co-ordinated and fundamental overhaul of the areas that have let leasehold down as a system of tenure’.

Mark Chick, director of the Association of Leasehold Enfranchisement Practitioners and partner at Bishop & Sewell, said the leasehold bill could be good news or ‘could fuel confusion, cost and controversy’.

Chick said extending leases to 990 years was an ‘easy win’, and highlighted his view that removing leasehold for new flats isn’t possible ‘until the work necessary to make the existing system of commonhold fit for purpose is complete’. 

Issue: 8048 / Categories: Legal News , Property , Landlord&tenant
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll