header-logo header-logo

08 November 2023
Issue: 8048 / Categories: Legal News , Property , Landlord&tenant
printer mail-detail

Reforms for landlords, renters & homeowners

Lawyers have given a cautious welcome to the inclusion in the King’s Speech of legislation to help leaseholders, with some warning reform will be complex and difficult while others predict little will change

Setting out the government’s legislative priorities for the next 12 months, King Charles announced a Leasehold and Freehold Bill to ban the creation of new leasehold houses and make it cheaper and easier for more leaseholders to: extend their lease, with a standard term of 990 years and zero ground rent for both houses and flats; buy their freehold; and take over management of their building. The rights will apply to leaseholders in buildings with up to 50% non-residential floorspace (such as flats above shops) and leaseholders will no longer have to wait two years before applying.

A Renters (Reform) Bill will also be introduced, abolishing ‘no-fault evictions’, adding mandatory grounds for possession including that the landlord wishes to sell the property or move a family member in, and providing for eviction within two weeks for a breach of the tenancy agreement or damage to the property. The Bill provides for a Private Rented Sector Ombudsman with binding powers to resolve tenancy disputes.

However, Jeremy Raj, head of residential property at Irwin Mitchell, said none of the proposals ‘deal with the fundamental issues troubling the housing market, such as lack of supply, uncertainty regarding future regulation, unsuitable stock for our environmental ambitions and our population profile, and of course the affordability crisis’. Moreover, Raj said the leasehold bill ‘disappoints those of us who have been hoping for many years now for a co-ordinated and fundamental overhaul of the areas that have let leasehold down as a system of tenure’.

Mark Chick, director of the Association of Leasehold Enfranchisement Practitioners and partner at Bishop & Sewell, said the leasehold bill could be good news or ‘could fuel confusion, cost and controversy’.

Chick said extending leases to 990 years was an ‘easy win’, and highlighted his view that removing leasehold for new flats isn’t possible ‘until the work necessary to make the existing system of commonhold fit for purpose is complete’. 

Issue: 8048 / Categories: Legal News , Property , Landlord&tenant
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

back-to-top-scroll