header-logo header-logo

Refund for search fee mistake

24 January 2013
Issue: 7545 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Administrative oversight at HMCTS

Solicitors could be due a refund following an administrative blunder by the courts.

HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has admitted incorrectly charging search fees dating back to 1999, and has promised full refunds to all affected.

The mistake relates to the fee paid for searches of the daily register of claims for all High Court jurisdictions apart from company records and bankruptcy proceedings, under Pt 5.4 of the Civil Procedure Rules. Since 26 April 1999, this fee of £5 has not been applicable and should not have been charged.

An HMCTS note explains that the error related to “an inconsistency” between the Civil Procedure Rules and Supreme Court Fees Order 1999 (SI 1999/687) and subsequent fees orders.

It advises its customers that, in order to claim a refund, they will need to provide a receipt for each payment claimed, and fill out a refund fee form. One form per customer is sufficient, and the forms can be picked up from the Rolls Building or the Royal Courts of Justice fees office.

Refunds will be paid by cheque within five weeks of receipt of the correct documentation.

An HMCTS spokesperson said the error was “due to an administrative oversight”.

“HMCTS has ceased charging for this service and taken steps to inform those customers affected of how they can claim a refund. All customers who have paid for searches of the daily register of all High Court jurisdictions since 26 April 1999 are entitled to a refund for the full amount paid, as long as they are able to provide proof of payment.”

Issue: 7545 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll