header-logo header-logo

09 May 2012 / Hle Blog
Issue: 7513 / Categories: Blogs
printer mail-detail

Regulating porn

HLE blogger Felicity Gerry wonders how we can protect children online

"In the week that many parents will have to explain why a stripper was put through on Britain’s Got Talent rather than a female impressionist, there has been much publicity on the idea of opt-in pornography and whether this would be an effective way of protecting children from accessing indecent images online.

Aside from the issues surrounding how this would be implemented, the main question is whether internet regulation is necessary at all.

Most parents and carers will have had their fair share of discussions regarding the downloading of inappropriate images. Sexual development is normal and every modern parent will have to deal with this at some point.

The question that is being asked on a more regular basis is should there be greater regulation of the media, or will children learn appropriate sexual conduct under their own steam with guidance from parents, carers and teachers?

The latest suggestion is that internet service providers should supply a “clean” broadband feed to customers as standard with

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll