header-logo header-logo

20 February 2026 / Andrew Francis
Issue: 8150 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Regulating the short let

242979
Andrew Francis tells some cautionary tales of restrictive covenants used for holiday & other short-term lettings
  • This article examines problems arising from restrictive covenants on short-term lets.
  • It examines the case law in relation to breach, which show the importance of considering the covenants affecting the title, either at the pre-contract stage, or post purchase where a change of use is contemplated.

Let us start with three examples.

No 1: Your client has instructed you to act on the purchase of the freehold title to a house by the sea. This is subject to a restrictive covenant providing that the property is ‘only to be used as a private dwelling house’. There is also a ‘no nuisance or annoyance’ covenant. Your client has told you that it intends to use the house for short-term/Airbnb letting during the holiday season.

No 2: Your client has instructed you to act on the purchase of a leasehold residential flat in central London. This is subject to tenant’s covenants providing that the property is

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll