header-logo header-logo

04 June 2025
Issue: 8119 / Categories: Legal News , Regulatory , Legal services , Risk management
printer mail-detail

Regulator sanctioned for Axiom Ince failings

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has been given 12 months to improve its safeguarding of risk, intervention and client money, under binding directions issued in response to the Axiom Ince scandal

It must provide quarterly written reports on progress to the Legal Services Board (LSB), and commission independent external auditors within 12 months to evaluate its compliance and identify any other weaknesses.

Catherine Brown, interim chair of the LSB, said: ‘The severity of what happened at Axiom Ince—with £60m in client money missing and 1,400 people losing their jobs—demanded decisive action, and we welcome the SRA’s constructive engagement with us during this statutory process.

‘The directions we've issued are designed to protect the public and better ensure client funds are properly safeguarded.’

The directions, which are binding under the Legal Services Act 2008, require the SRA to ‘revise its regulatory arrangements and guidance to… protect consumers and the public from potential harm arising from a single individual holding more than one role in a firm or other authorised body eg owner, manager, compliance officer for legal practice, compliance officer for finance and administration, and money laundering compliance officer’.

Axiom Ince grew rapidly through a series of mergers and acquisitions before being closed by the SRA in October 2023. The firm’s owner held multiple compliance roles.

The SRA must also ‘ensure firms have effective safeguards to protect client money’ and ‘put in place measures to enable more effective risk-based scrutiny of firms undergoing sale, merger or acquisition’.

The SRA is due to make a decision before the end of this year on whether it will go ahead with its proposals to stop firms handling client money.

Paul Philip, SRA chief executive, said: ‘We have been working over the past months with the LSB on our plan to address and implement its directions.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—James Inness

Sidley—James Inness

Partner joins capital markets team in London office

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Firm announces appointment of partner as UK general counsel

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Firm appoints first chief marketing officer to drive growth strategy

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll