header-logo header-logo

Regulator sanctioned for Axiom Ince failings

04 June 2025
Issue: 8119 / Categories: Legal News , Regulatory , Legal services , Risk management
printer mail-detail
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has been given 12 months to improve its safeguarding of risk, intervention and client money, under binding directions issued in response to the Axiom Ince scandal

It must provide quarterly written reports on progress to the Legal Services Board (LSB), and commission independent external auditors within 12 months to evaluate its compliance and identify any other weaknesses.

Catherine Brown, interim chair of the LSB, said: ‘The severity of what happened at Axiom Ince—with £60m in client money missing and 1,400 people losing their jobs—demanded decisive action, and we welcome the SRA’s constructive engagement with us during this statutory process.

‘The directions we've issued are designed to protect the public and better ensure client funds are properly safeguarded.’

The directions, which are binding under the Legal Services Act 2008, require the SRA to ‘revise its regulatory arrangements and guidance to… protect consumers and the public from potential harm arising from a single individual holding more than one role in a firm or other authorised body eg owner, manager, compliance officer for legal practice, compliance officer for finance and administration, and money laundering compliance officer’.

Axiom Ince grew rapidly through a series of mergers and acquisitions before being closed by the SRA in October 2023. The firm’s owner held multiple compliance roles.

The SRA must also ‘ensure firms have effective safeguards to protect client money’ and ‘put in place measures to enable more effective risk-based scrutiny of firms undergoing sale, merger or acquisition’.

The SRA is due to make a decision before the end of this year on whether it will go ahead with its proposals to stop firms handling client money.

Paul Philip, SRA chief executive, said: ‘We have been working over the past months with the LSB on our plan to address and implement its directions.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Head of corporate promoted to director

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Firm strengthens international arbitration team with key London hire

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

FCA contentious financial regulation lawyer joins the team as of counsel

NEWS
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ
The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law
Caroline Shea KC and Richard Miller of Falcon Chambers examine the growing judicial focus on 'cynical breach' in restrictive covenant cases, in this week's issue of NLJ
Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis dissects the uneasy balance between open justice and confidentiality in England’s civil courts, in this week's NLJ. From public hearings to super-injunctions, he identifies five tiers of privacy—from fully open proceedings to entirely secret ones—showing how a patchwork of exceptions has evolved without clear design
back-to-top-scroll