header-logo header-logo

04 October 2023
Issue: 8043 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

Regulator takes on SIF

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) is now in charge of the Solicitors Indemnity Fund (SIF), following years of uncertainty over its future

Law Society President Lubna Shuja said: ‘This move followed extensive lobbying from the Law Society on behalf of solicitors and their clients, urging the SRA to work with us, the insurance industry and wider stakeholders to find a sustainable solution to the issue of run-off indemnity cover and long-term consumer protection.

‘This means clients can have confidence not only that their solicitor is adequately and appropriately insured while a firm remains open, but there are systems in place to make sure that they can still be compensated in the unlikely event that a claim is identified beyond the usual six-year term of solicitors’ mandatory run-off cover.’

SIF had originally been scheduled to close in 2020, but solicitors feared this could leave some retired solicitors exposed to risk.

Polo Commercial Insurance Services Limited have been appointed to handle SIF claims. SIF will cover losses relating to work done before 2000 when it provided indemnity to all solicitors’ firms.

Differences in opinion over the funding of SIF have been ironed out. The Law Society thought there should be a levy on the profession to maintain its assets. The SRA has said no to the levy but has committed to consulting on it should the need arise.

The SRA has also confirmed that in the event of a dispute arising, an independent body will be asked to appoint an arbitrator. If SIF is wound up, and the SRA has no further indemnification purpose for the residual funds, any remaining money will return to the Law Society, to be used for the benefit of the profession.

Paul Philip, SRA chief executive, said: ‘By running the scheme ourselves, we will provide assurance for all that there is ongoing protection for clients.’ 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll