header-logo header-logo

24 January 2013
Issue: 7545 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Regulatory irregularity

Compliance officer nominees come under question

Law firms have nominated bankrupts, convicted criminals and lawyers subject to “serious disciplinary sanctions” as their COLP and COFA compliance officers.

A Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) progress report published this week outlined the SRA’s concern about “the levels of non-disclosure of information” among nominees. It revealed that more than 450 nominees failed the verification report for “multiple issues, some of which were serious, ranging from undisclosed criminal convictions through to serious disciplinary sanctions and undeclared bankruptcy”.

Nearly all firms (9,744 or 98.5%) have now completed their nominations, and most (9,165) have been approved. Enforcement action has begun against 152 firms that have not yet completed their forms.

SRA executive director Samantha Barrass says: “Enforcement action will be proportionate and will range from letters of advice, fines, rebukes, through to revocation of authorisation, and referral to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal. The importance of having the right people in place in these key compliance roles cannot be underestimated and we are pleased at the high levels of co-operation we have received from the great

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll