header-logo header-logo

16 March 2018 / John Gould
Issue: 7785 / Categories: Features , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Regulatory matters

nlj_7785_gould

John Gould explains why honesty & integrity are not the same

  • The relationship between two concepts: honesty and integrity.
  • Clear ethical standards are the foundation of our profession and the basis of the public trust upon which our profession depends.
  • Distinguishing between the two, integrity is the standard that matters for the regulation of our profession.

You might have thought that what it means to act honestly or with integrity wouldn’t have been in much doubt since the days when Adam came to realise that serpents weren’t to be trusted to the ends of the Garden of Eden. You would, however, be wrong. Ethical standards change according to time and place. If there had been a Viking Code of Conduct, no doubt successful murder and pillage would have been required outcomes and the particularly harsh treatment of monks an indicative behaviour.

The same, of course, is true of the standards of conduct generally. Once, a solicitor who kept clients’ money in his own bank account and acted as a banker would not have been criticised

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
back-to-top-scroll