header-logo header-logo

Regulatory matters

16 March 2018 / John Gould
Issue: 7785 / Categories: Features , Regulatory
printer mail-detail
nlj_7785_gould

John Gould explains why honesty & integrity are not the same

  • The relationship between two concepts: honesty and integrity.
  • Clear ethical standards are the foundation of our profession and the basis of the public trust upon which our profession depends.
  • Distinguishing between the two, integrity is the standard that matters for the regulation of our profession.

You might have thought that what it means to act honestly or with integrity wouldn’t have been in much doubt since the days when Adam came to realise that serpents weren’t to be trusted to the ends of the Garden of Eden. You would, however, be wrong. Ethical standards change according to time and place. If there had been a Viking Code of Conduct, no doubt successful murder and pillage would have been required outcomes and the particularly harsh treatment of monks an indicative behaviour.

The same, of course, is true of the standards of conduct generally. Once, a solicitor who kept clients’ money in his own bank account and acted as a banker would not have been criticised

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll