header-logo header-logo

16 March 2018 / John Gould
Issue: 7785 / Categories: Features , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Regulatory matters

nlj_7785_gould

John Gould explains why honesty & integrity are not the same

  • The relationship between two concepts: honesty and integrity.
  • Clear ethical standards are the foundation of our profession and the basis of the public trust upon which our profession depends.
  • Distinguishing between the two, integrity is the standard that matters for the regulation of our profession.

You might have thought that what it means to act honestly or with integrity wouldn’t have been in much doubt since the days when Adam came to realise that serpents weren’t to be trusted to the ends of the Garden of Eden. You would, however, be wrong. Ethical standards change according to time and place. If there had been a Viking Code of Conduct, no doubt successful murder and pillage would have been required outcomes and the particularly harsh treatment of monks an indicative behaviour.

The same, of course, is true of the standards of conduct generally. Once, a solicitor who kept clients’ money in his own bank account and acted as a banker would not have been criticised

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll