header-logo header-logo

04 May 2018 / Jonathan Clarke
Issue: 7791 / Categories: Features , Health & safety , Employment
printer mail-detail

A rehearsal too far

nlj_7791_clarkes

A drama at the opera has turned the spotlight on the music industry’s legal obligations to protect musicians. Jonathan Clarke talks to Susan Ghaiwal

  • The first known case of a professional musician claiming damages for injury resulting from the loudness of the music which he and/or his fellow musicians played.

The recent case of Goldscheider v Royal Opera House Covent Garden Foundation [2018] EWHC 687 (QB), [2018] All ER (D) 09 (Apr) is the first known case of a professional musician claiming damages for injury resulting from the loudness of the music which he and/or his fellow musicians played. The decision clearly demonstrates that health and safety legislation (in this case the Control of Noise at Work Regulations 2005, (SI 2005/1643)) applies to all employers, including those in the music and entertainment sectors. The employer’s duty to ensure the employee’s health and safety at work is not subservient to considerations of artistic excellence. ‘The Regulations recognise no distinction as between a factory and an opera house’ (para [207] of the judgment).

The case

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll