header-logo header-logo

A rehearsal too far

04 May 2018 / Jonathan Clarke
Issue: 7791 / Categories: Features , Health & safety , Employment
printer mail-detail
nlj_7791_clarkes

A drama at the opera has turned the spotlight on the music industry’s legal obligations to protect musicians. Jonathan Clarke talks to Susan Ghaiwal

  • The first known case of a professional musician claiming damages for injury resulting from the loudness of the music which he and/or his fellow musicians played.

The recent case of Goldscheider v Royal Opera House Covent Garden Foundation [2018] EWHC 687 (QB), [2018] All ER (D) 09 (Apr) is the first known case of a professional musician claiming damages for injury resulting from the loudness of the music which he and/or his fellow musicians played. The decision clearly demonstrates that health and safety legislation (in this case the Control of Noise at Work Regulations 2005, (SI 2005/1643)) applies to all employers, including those in the music and entertainment sectors. The employer’s duty to ensure the employee’s health and safety at work is not subservient to considerations of artistic excellence. ‘The Regulations recognise no distinction as between a factory and an opera house’ (para [207] of the judgment).

The case

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll