header-logo header-logo

04 May 2018 / Jonathan Clarke
Issue: 7791 / Categories: Features , Health & safety , Employment
printer mail-detail

A rehearsal too far

nlj_7791_clarkes

A drama at the opera has turned the spotlight on the music industry’s legal obligations to protect musicians. Jonathan Clarke talks to Susan Ghaiwal

  • The first known case of a professional musician claiming damages for injury resulting from the loudness of the music which he and/or his fellow musicians played.

The recent case of Goldscheider v Royal Opera House Covent Garden Foundation [2018] EWHC 687 (QB), [2018] All ER (D) 09 (Apr) is the first known case of a professional musician claiming damages for injury resulting from the loudness of the music which he and/or his fellow musicians played. The decision clearly demonstrates that health and safety legislation (in this case the Control of Noise at Work Regulations 2005, (SI 2005/1643)) applies to all employers, including those in the music and entertainment sectors. The employer’s duty to ensure the employee’s health and safety at work is not subservient to considerations of artistic excellence. ‘The Regulations recognise no distinction as between a factory and an opera house’ (para [207] of the judgment).

The case

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll