header-logo header-logo

A rehearsal too far

04 May 2018 / Jonathan Clarke
Issue: 7791 / Categories: Features , Health & safety , Employment
printer mail-detail
nlj_7791_clarkes

A drama at the opera has turned the spotlight on the music industry’s legal obligations to protect musicians. Jonathan Clarke talks to Susan Ghaiwal

  • The first known case of a professional musician claiming damages for injury resulting from the loudness of the music which he and/or his fellow musicians played.

The recent case of Goldscheider v Royal Opera House Covent Garden Foundation [2018] EWHC 687 (QB), [2018] All ER (D) 09 (Apr) is the first known case of a professional musician claiming damages for injury resulting from the loudness of the music which he and/or his fellow musicians played. The decision clearly demonstrates that health and safety legislation (in this case the Control of Noise at Work Regulations 2005, (SI 2005/1643)) applies to all employers, including those in the music and entertainment sectors. The employer’s duty to ensure the employee’s health and safety at work is not subservient to considerations of artistic excellence. ‘The Regulations recognise no distinction as between a factory and an opera house’ (para [207] of the judgment).

The case

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll