header-logo header-logo

Reinsurance

20 November 2009
Issue: 7394 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Equitas Ltd v R and Q Reinsurance Company (UK) Ltd [2009] EWHC 2787 (Comm), [2009] All ER (D) 154 (Nov)

When it came to proving that a reinsured came within the provisos of a settlement clause, a distinction had to be drawn between the facts which generated the claims and the legal extent of the cover provided.

Contracts of reinsurance were independent bargains, separate from the underlying contracts of insurance. In order for insurers to recover from their underwriters, they had to prove the loss in the same manner as the original assured had had to prove it against them.

The insurance market, in order to simplify and hasten procedures, had however developed ‘settlement clauses’ to get round the need to prove their loss by proving an insured loss of the original subject-matter.

Under such a clause, the reinsurers agreed to indemnify insurers in the event that they settled a claim by their assured, provided that the claim fell within the risks covered by the policy of reinsurance as a matter of law.

How a claimant proved that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Chester office

Slater Heelis—Chester office

North West presence strengthened with Chester office launch

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Firm grows commercial disputes expertise with partner promotion

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

NEWS
The House of Lords has set up a select committee to examine assisted dying, which will delay the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
back-to-top-scroll