header-logo header-logo

26 June 2008 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7327 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Rejecting Carter

Professor Michael Zander assesses the 24 main responses to the Gage working group's consultation paper on sentencing

The Sentencing Working Group, chaired by Lord Justice Gage, is currently considering two main proposals: adoption of an American-style grid system that would drastically restrict judicial discretion and establishment of a Sentencing Commission that could be required to tailor sentencing guidelines to fit the size of the prison estate.

Lord Carter, in his report, Securing the Future-Proposals for the Efficient and Sustainable Use of Custody in England and Wales, December 2007 (see NLJ, 1 February 2008, p 162), recommended that these two ideas be considered by a working party which should report “by summer 2008”. (The working group, on a seriously tight schedule, aims to report early in July.)

The working group's consultation paper issued on 31 March called for responses by 2 June. When the secretariat declared the consultation closed, it was stated that there had been 228 responses. This count is, however, misleading since a high proportion were effectively duplicates. Thus, for instance,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Sara Mason

Bellevue Law—Sara Mason

Bellevue Law expands workplace law offering with specialist healthcare regulatory appointment

Seddons GSC—Peter Ames

Seddons GSC—Peter Ames

Seddons GSC strengthens Dispute Resolution team with partner hire

Taylor Rose—four promotions

Taylor Rose—four promotions

Taylor Rose announces partner promotions

NEWS
Group claims, disputed costs and judicial recruitment dominate the latest courtroom round-up
Landlords face fresh registration duties as procedural reforms reshape the civil courts
Sanctions can derail commercial disputes long before judgment, making early planning essential
Pressure is mounting for a dedicated UK AI law, but deciding what it should achieve remains the central challenge
Legal professional privilege has checked the SRA’s investigative powers, exposing difficult questions about tackling suspected abusive litigation
back-to-top-scroll