header-logo header-logo

Rejecting Carter

26 June 2008 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7327 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Professor Michael Zander assesses the 24 main responses to the Gage working group's consultation paper on sentencing

The Sentencing Working Group, chaired by Lord Justice Gage, is currently considering two main proposals: adoption of an American-style grid system that would drastically restrict judicial discretion and establishment of a Sentencing Commission that could be required to tailor sentencing guidelines to fit the size of the prison estate.

Lord Carter, in his report, Securing the Future-Proposals for the Efficient and Sustainable Use of Custody in England and Wales, December 2007 (see NLJ, 1 February 2008, p 162), recommended that these two ideas be considered by a working party which should report “by summer 2008”. (The working group, on a seriously tight schedule, aims to report early in July.)

The working group's consultation paper issued on 31 March called for responses by 2 June. When the secretariat declared the consultation closed, it was stated that there had been 228 responses. This count is, however, misleading since a high proportion were effectively duplicates. Thus, for instance,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Taylor Rose—nine promotions

Taylor Rose—nine promotions

Leadership strengthened across core practice areas with nine new partners

Fieldfisher—Rebecca Maxwell

Fieldfisher—Rebecca Maxwell

Real estate team welcomes partner inBirmingham

Ward Hadaway—14 trainee solicitors

Ward Hadaway—14 trainee solicitors

Firm strengthens commitment to nurturing future legal talent

NEWS
Government plans for offender ‘restriction zones’ risk creating ‘digital cages’ that blur punishment with surveillance, warns Henrietta Ronson, partner at Corker Binning, in this week's issue of NLJ
Louise Uphill, senior associate at Moore Barlow LLP, dissects the faltering rollout of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 in this week's NLJ
Judgments are ‘worthless without enforcement’, says HHJ Karen Walden-Smith, senior circuit judge and chair of the Civil Justice Council’s enforcement working group. In this week's NLJ, she breaks down the CJC’s April 2025 report, which identified systemic flaws and proposed 39 reforms, from modernising procedures to protecting vulnerable debtors
Writing in NLJ this week, Katherine Harding and Charlotte Finley of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Standish v Standish [2025] UKSC 26, the Supreme Court ruling that narrowed what counts as matrimonial property, and its potential impact upon claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
In this week's NLJ, Dr Jon Robins, editor of The Justice Gap and lecturer at Brighton University, reports on a campaign to posthumously exonerate Christine Keeler. 60 years after her perjury conviction, Keeler’s son Seymour Platt has petitioned the king to exercise the royal prerogative of mercy, arguing she was a victim of violence and moral hypocrisy, not deceit. Supported by Felicity Gerry KC, the dossier brands the conviction 'the ultimate in slut-shaming'
back-to-top-scroll