header-logo header-logo

Release under investigation: times are changing

09 July 2021 / Cathál MacPartholán
Issue: 7940 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail
52412
Cathál MacPartholán examines pre-charge bail: has the Policing and Crime Act 2017 reframed rather than reformed the problem?
  • Reforms made to pre-charge bail by the Policing and Crime Act 2017.
  • The post-2017 position on pre-charge bail time limits, and release under investigation (RUI).
  • The recent consultation on this area, and the proposed future changes.

The Policing and Crime Act 2017 (PCA 2017) made a number of changes to pre-charge bail across England and Wales, introducing a presumption of release without bail, unless the relevant necessity and proportionality criteria are met—and a 28-day time limit for pre-charge bail in most cases. While the time limit on bail was largely welcomed, the ‘release under investigation’ (RUI) approach to dealing with suspects has not been as popularly perceived, despite its heavy use. Thus, in November 2019, a consultation process was launched by the Home Office, seeking stakeholders’ views on the effects of RUI.

This article comments on, and critically evaluates, the outcomes of recent consultations on pre-charge bail and RUI, in the context

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll