header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
09 July 2021 / Cathál MacPartholán
Issue: 7940 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Release under investigation: times are changing

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
52412
Cathál MacPartholán examines pre-charge bail: has the Policing and Crime Act 2017 reframed rather than reformed the problem?
  • Reforms made to pre-charge bail by the Policing and Crime Act 2017.
  • The post-2017 position on pre-charge bail time limits, and release under investigation (RUI).
  • The recent consultation on this area, and the proposed future changes.

The Policing and Crime Act 2017 (PCA 2017) made a number of changes to pre-charge bail across England and Wales, introducing a presumption of release without bail, unless the relevant necessity and proportionality criteria are met—and a 28-day time limit for pre-charge bail in most cases. While the time limit on bail was largely welcomed, the ‘release under investigation’ (RUI) approach to dealing with suspects has not been as popularly perceived, despite its heavy use. Thus, in November 2019, a consultation process was launched by the Home Office, seeking stakeholders’ views on the effects of RUI.

This article comments on, and critically evaluates, the outcomes of recent consultations on pre-charge bail and RUI, in the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll