header-logo header-logo

Release under investigation: times are changing

09 July 2021 / Cathál MacPartholán
Issue: 7940 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail
52412
Cathál MacPartholán examines pre-charge bail: has the Policing and Crime Act 2017 reframed rather than reformed the problem?
  • Reforms made to pre-charge bail by the Policing and Crime Act 2017.
  • The post-2017 position on pre-charge bail time limits, and release under investigation (RUI).
  • The recent consultation on this area, and the proposed future changes.

The Policing and Crime Act 2017 (PCA 2017) made a number of changes to pre-charge bail across England and Wales, introducing a presumption of release without bail, unless the relevant necessity and proportionality criteria are met—and a 28-day time limit for pre-charge bail in most cases. While the time limit on bail was largely welcomed, the ‘release under investigation’ (RUI) approach to dealing with suspects has not been as popularly perceived, despite its heavy use. Thus, in November 2019, a consultation process was launched by the Home Office, seeking stakeholders’ views on the effects of RUI.

This article comments on, and critically evaluates, the outcomes of recent consultations on pre-charge bail and RUI, in the context

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll