header-logo header-logo

Release under investigation: times are changing

09 July 2021 / Cathál MacPartholán
Issue: 7940 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail
52412
Cathál MacPartholán examines pre-charge bail: has the Policing and Crime Act 2017 reframed rather than reformed the problem?
  • Reforms made to pre-charge bail by the Policing and Crime Act 2017.
  • The post-2017 position on pre-charge bail time limits, and release under investigation (RUI).
  • The recent consultation on this area, and the proposed future changes.

The Policing and Crime Act 2017 (PCA 2017) made a number of changes to pre-charge bail across England and Wales, introducing a presumption of release without bail, unless the relevant necessity and proportionality criteria are met—and a 28-day time limit for pre-charge bail in most cases. While the time limit on bail was largely welcomed, the ‘release under investigation’ (RUI) approach to dealing with suspects has not been as popularly perceived, despite its heavy use. Thus, in November 2019, a consultation process was launched by the Home Office, seeking stakeholders’ views on the effects of RUI.

This article comments on, and critically evaluates, the outcomes of recent consultations on pre-charge bail and RUI, in the context

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll