header-logo header-logo

14 July 2023 / David Burrows
Issue: 8033 / Categories: Features , Family , Procedure & practice , Child law
printer mail-detail

Releasing documents in children proceedings: a tangled web

130128
A Byzantine set of rules governs the release of documents in children proceedings: David Burrows calls for some sorely-needed simplicity
  • The complex procedural rules surrounding the release of documents by parties to children proceedings are at odds with the requirement under the Courts Act 2003 that rules be ‘simple and simply expressed’.
  • In a recent judgment, Mr Justice Mostyn urged rule-makers to look again at the ‘Byzantine’ rules covering what parties can lawfully disclose to the police.

My brother columnist Stephen Gold in ‘Civil way’, NLJ, 16 June 2023 at p15, drew attention to the Byzantine twists demanded by procedural rules on release of documents by parties to children proceedings exposed by Mr Justice Mostyn in EBK v DLO [2023] EWHC 1074 (Fam). This subject takes an unsuspecting parent into a variety of confusing (including for Mostyn J) and confused crosscurrents of law and procedural rules. As this article concludes, the twists demanded by the rules may justify parties to a case like

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll