header-logo header-logo

Relevance of assets in business valuations

10 January 2025 / Rakesh Kapila
Issue: 8099 / Categories: Features , Profession , Company , Insolvency , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail
202613
Rakesh Kapila explains when it is important to consider assets when valuing businesses
  • Discusses the relevance of assets in going concern and break-up business valuations and valuations relating to particular sectors.

Business valuations may be undertaken with a view to a sale of a business or for tax purposes. They will also often need t o be carried out where litigation is in prospect, such as disputes between shareholders or partners, divorce cases, and cases involving a lost business opportunity. In addition, valuations may occasionally be required in personal injury or loss of profits cases in which a business has ceased trading or has been sold.

It is necessary to consider whether the primary focus of the valuation will be on the capitalised maintainable earnings of the business, on the value of discounted future cash flows, on its net asset base or on the capitalised value of dividends paid by the business. In general, if a business is a going concern, it is appropriate to consider

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll