header-logo header-logo

Relevance of assets in business valuations

10 January 2025 / Rakesh Kapila
Issue: 8099 / Categories: Features , Profession , Company , Insolvency , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail
202613
Rakesh Kapila explains when it is important to consider assets when valuing businesses
  • Discusses the relevance of assets in going concern and break-up business valuations and valuations relating to particular sectors.

Business valuations may be undertaken with a view to a sale of a business or for tax purposes. They will also often need t o be carried out where litigation is in prospect, such as disputes between shareholders or partners, divorce cases, and cases involving a lost business opportunity. In addition, valuations may occasionally be required in personal injury or loss of profits cases in which a business has ceased trading or has been sold.

It is necessary to consider whether the primary focus of the valuation will be on the capitalised maintainable earnings of the business, on the value of discounted future cash flows, on its net asset base or on the capitalised value of dividends paid by the business. In general, if a business is a going concern, it is appropriate to consider

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll