header-logo header-logo

03 December 2009
Issue: 7396 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Remuneration disclosure

Forcing banks to disclose remuneration details of top earners is part of a package of reforms recommended in the final report of Sir David Walker’s review into corporate governance.

Forcing banks to disclose remuneration details of top earners is part of a package of reforms recommended in the final report of Sir David Walker’s review into corporate governance.

The report, published last week, recommended that companies establish risk committees and remuneration committees to risk-assess relevant remuneration policies, that non-executive directors play a greater role in governance, and that directors and ‘high end’ earners acquire shares with an equal value to their annual remuneration.

Mathew Rutter, partner at national commercial law firm Beachcroft LLP, says: “Sir David’s recommendations will require a big cultural change in many boardrooms, and a change in the role of the chairman and non-executive director in particular. Although the focus is on banks, the review says that many of the recommendations are at least partially applicable to other financial institutions, such as life insurers. All FSA regulated firms should therefore be looking at these recommendations and thinking about how they should apply the principles proportionately to their business.”

Sue Ashtiany, head of employment at Nabarro, says: “The final recommendations of the Walker review are strong on enhanced responsibilities for non executive directors, and there is a potentially hugely enlarged remit for those who sit on remuneration committees.

“The premise that remuneration committees will be able to create effective oversight presupposes that there are transparent answers to the issues that currently grip the public imagination. Remuneration policies have complex consequences, which are not always apparent at first review.”
 

Issue: 7396 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll