header-logo header-logo

07 May 2009 / Mark Sefton , Cameron Lawes
Issue: 7368 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Rent in administration

In rental default cases landlords are often caught in the middle, say Cameron Lawes & Mark Sefton

* * * * * *

Here is a recurring theme of the current recession. A landlord has let some premises to a tenant. The tenant is overburdened with debt, but nevertheless it has a sound underlying business. The simple solution? It puts itself into administration, and the administrator then sells the business to a new company formed for that purpose by the outgoing management team. The business carries on just as before, but now it is free of its debts. The creditors, on the other hand, are left to claw back the debt out of a share of the proceeds got in by the administrator from the sale of the business. Most of the debt will, of course, have to be written off. But where does the landlord fit into this unhappy picture?

What the landlord will almost certainly find is that the premises are now being occupied, not by the old company,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll