header-logo header-logo

04 June 2009 / Tony Guise
Issue: 7372 / Categories: Opinion , In-House , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

Representation matters

Tony Guise says representation is as important as reputation

Des Hudson’s recent article, Reputation matters, clarified a number of issues regarding the regulation and discipline of the profession (see NLJ, 3 April 2009, p 488). It is, however, worth reflecting on some further issues. Schemes such as the Solicitors’ Assistance Scheme (SAS) and Law Care provide an invaluable service, but whether they can level a playing field dominated by a well resourced regulator is doubtful.

Help from the SAS
SAS panel members provide an hour’s free advice either by telephone or in person advising about regulatory matters, partnership, money laundering and other compliance related issues. Until the recent shake-up of the Law Society, after Sir David Clementi’s review of the regulatory framework for legal services in England and Wales, the scheme was financed by the Law Society. Recently, however, the SAS has suffered a swingeing cut in this support with only limited meeting expenses being provided by the Law Society.

SAS committee members provide a helpline and support network for solicitors facing professional crisis,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

Bird & Bird—Gordon Moir

Bird & Bird—Gordon Moir

London tech and comms team boosted by telecoms and regulatory hires

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll