header-logo header-logo

04 June 2009 / Tony Guise
Issue: 7372 / Categories: Opinion , In-House , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

Representation matters

Tony Guise says representation is as important as reputation

Des Hudson’s recent article, Reputation matters, clarified a number of issues regarding the regulation and discipline of the profession (see NLJ, 3 April 2009, p 488). It is, however, worth reflecting on some further issues. Schemes such as the Solicitors’ Assistance Scheme (SAS) and Law Care provide an invaluable service, but whether they can level a playing field dominated by a well resourced regulator is doubtful.

Help from the SAS
SAS panel members provide an hour’s free advice either by telephone or in person advising about regulatory matters, partnership, money laundering and other compliance related issues. Until the recent shake-up of the Law Society, after Sir David Clementi’s review of the regulatory framework for legal services in England and Wales, the scheme was financed by the Law Society. Recently, however, the SAS has suffered a swingeing cut in this support with only limited meeting expenses being provided by the Law Society.

SAS committee members provide a helpline and support network for solicitors facing professional crisis,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll