header-logo header-logo

Reputation on trial

20 June 2025 / James Lynch
Issue: 8121 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Dispute resolution , Media
printer mail-detail
223023
James Lynch, a partner at Maltin PR, explains why the role of public relations experts is becoming increasingly critical in litigation

England and Wales remains one of the world’s leading jurisdictions for high-value litigation and arbitration, bolstered by the London courts’ global reputation for impartiality and independence. Even after Brexit, English law underpins billions in international contracts and transactions, with legal services contributing £60bn to the UK economy. From contractual disputes to defamation and collective actions, London routinely hears cases that draw significant international attention. For litigants—particularly corporates and high-profile individuals—this means not only legal risk but also reputational exposure, often on a global scale.

Legal teams are now expected to factor reputational considerations into case strategy from the outset. Increasingly, litigation public relations (PR) professionals work in tandem with legal counsel to develop communication plans, monitor press interest, brief journalists on the case where appropriate, and correct any published misinformation—all while ensuring consistency with the legal approach. The myriad rules around communicating throughout the legal proceedings require an expert touch

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll