header-logo header-logo

20 June 2025 / James Lynch
Issue: 8121 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Dispute resolution , Media
printer mail-detail

Reputation on trial

223023
James Lynch, a partner at Maltin PR, explains why the role of public relations experts is becoming increasingly critical in litigation

England and Wales remains one of the world’s leading jurisdictions for high-value litigation and arbitration, bolstered by the London courts’ global reputation for impartiality and independence. Even after Brexit, English law underpins billions in international contracts and transactions, with legal services contributing £60bn to the UK economy. From contractual disputes to defamation and collective actions, London routinely hears cases that draw significant international attention. For litigants—particularly corporates and high-profile individuals—this means not only legal risk but also reputational exposure, often on a global scale.

Legal teams are now expected to factor reputational considerations into case strategy from the outset. Increasingly, litigation public relations (PR) professionals work in tandem with legal counsel to develop communication plans, monitor press interest, brief journalists on the case where appropriate, and correct any published misinformation—all while ensuring consistency with the legal approach. The myriad rules around communicating throughout the legal proceedings require an expert touch

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll