header-logo header-logo

Request, recovery & return: an update (Pt 2)

03 October 2025 / Michael L Nash
Issue: 8133 / Categories: Features , Profession , International
printer mail-detail
231378
From looted Nazi gold to the Elgin Marbles, Michael L Nash continues his series on possession vs ownership

In brief

  • The article explores the evolving issues distinguishing possession from ownership, especially in cases involving artefacts of cultural, and historical value—often complicated by national boundaries, wartime looting and shifting political contexts.
  • From looted Nazi gold to the Elgin Marbles and Ethiopian artefacts, there is a tangled web of claims, counterclaims and diplomatic tensions surrounding the rightful ownership and repatriation of artefacts.

In Part 1, we considered treasure at the bottom of the sea and looted jewels (see NLJ, 5 September 2025, p20). In this concluding part, we start with ‘the Sherlock Holmes of Nazi loot’, Christopher Marinello. For 30 years, he has been tracking down stolen masterpieces, such as paintings by Picasso, Matisse and Andy Warhol. So successful is he that insurance firms, auction houses, museums, private collectors and police forces worldwide turn to him when their efforts have not produced results. In 2013,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

London firm announces acquisition of corporate team

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Head of corporate appointed following Teesside merger

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Firm expands into banking and finance sector with newly appointed head of banking

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll