header-logo header-logo

03 October 2025 / Michael L Nash
Issue: 8133 / Categories: Features , Profession , International
printer mail-detail

Request, recovery & return: an update (Pt 2)

231378
From looted Nazi gold to the Elgin Marbles, Michael L Nash continues his series on possession vs ownership

In brief

  • The article explores the evolving issues distinguishing possession from ownership, especially in cases involving artefacts of cultural, and historical value—often complicated by national boundaries, wartime looting and shifting political contexts.
  • From looted Nazi gold to the Elgin Marbles and Ethiopian artefacts, there is a tangled web of claims, counterclaims and diplomatic tensions surrounding the rightful ownership and repatriation of artefacts.

In Part 1, we considered treasure at the bottom of the sea and looted jewels (see NLJ, 5 September 2025, p20). In this concluding part, we start with ‘the Sherlock Holmes of Nazi loot’, Christopher Marinello. For 30 years, he has been tracking down stolen masterpieces, such as paintings by Picasso, Matisse and Andy Warhol. So successful is he that insurance firms, auction houses, museums, private collectors and police forces worldwide turn to him when their efforts have not produced results. In

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll