header-logo header-logo

03 October 2025 / Michael L Nash
Issue: 8133 / Categories: Features , Profession , International
printer mail-detail

Request, recovery & return: an update (Pt 2)

231378
From looted Nazi gold to the Elgin Marbles, Michael L Nash continues his series on possession vs ownership

In brief

  • The article explores the evolving issues distinguishing possession from ownership, especially in cases involving artefacts of cultural, and historical value—often complicated by national boundaries, wartime looting and shifting political contexts.
  • From looted Nazi gold to the Elgin Marbles and Ethiopian artefacts, there is a tangled web of claims, counterclaims and diplomatic tensions surrounding the rightful ownership and repatriation of artefacts.

In Part 1, we considered treasure at the bottom of the sea and looted jewels (see NLJ, 5 September 2025, p20). In this concluding part, we start with ‘the Sherlock Holmes of Nazi loot’, Christopher Marinello. For 30 years, he has been tracking down stolen masterpieces, such as paintings by Picasso, Matisse and Andy Warhol. So successful is he that insurance firms, auction houses, museums, private collectors and police forces worldwide turn to him when their efforts have not produced results. In

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll