Rescue or detention?

Barbara Hewson discusses the Court of Appeal’s latest ruling on deprivation of liberty

The Court of Appeal gave judgment last month in a test case on the limits of Art 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights (P & Q v Surrey County Council [2011] EWCA Civ 190, [2011] All ER (D) 286 (Feb)). The case, formerly known as MiG & MeG, had become something of a cause célèbre for lawyers practising in the field of mental capacity. But what did the court decide? It unanimously upheld a decision of the High Court (Parker J) that two young women who had been rescued from an abusive family environment were not being deprived of their liberty.

Judicial retreat

The case illustrates a judicial retreat from the implications of the Bournewood decision, HL v United Kingdom (2004) 40 EHRR 761. HL was an autistic man who was taken to a mental hospital, after an incident of self-harm in a day centre.

HL lacked capacity to agree to stay in hospital on a voluntary basis, and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

Rescue or detention?

Barbara Hewson discusses the Court of Appeal’s latest ruling on deprivation of liberty

HL lacked capacity to agree to stay in hospital on a voluntary basis, and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS

Read All

NLJ this week: When post-breach events rewrite damages claims

Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation

NLJ this week: Supreme Court redraws unfair prejudice rules

The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ

NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception

The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week

NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform

The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ

NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers

A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

Error message

Rescue or detention?

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

DWF—Chris Air