header-logo header-logo

14 October 2016 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 7718 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

A resigning matter

nlj_7718_backpage

Athelstane Aamodt examines the wonderfully British way in which an MP must leave Parliament

On 12 September David Cameron, the Member of Parliament for Whitney and the former prime minster, announced that he had stood down as an MP. This was obviously big news, but the reporting of Mr Cameron’s announcement—as is usually the case with MPs that stand down—did not mention an utterly bizarre fact about Members of Parliament in the UK: they cannot resign.

Under a resolution of the House of Commons, dated 2 March 1624, it was held that “a man, after he is duly chosen, cannot relinquish”. The convention previous to this was that MPs could not resign, although Parliament did occasionally order by-elections in the cases of members that were incurably ill or infirm.

On 30 December 1680, another resolution of the House of Commons was passed. It said: “Resolved, Nemine contradicente . That no member of this house shall accept any office, or place or profit, from the Crown, without the leave of this House, or any promise of any

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
The Legal Action Group (LAG)—the UK charity dedicated to advancing access to justice—has unveiled its calendar of training courses, seminars and conferences designed to support lawyers, advisers and other legal professionals in tackling key areas of public interest law
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll