header-logo header-logo

14 October 2016 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 7718 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

A resigning matter

nlj_7718_backpage

Athelstane Aamodt examines the wonderfully British way in which an MP must leave Parliament

On 12 September David Cameron, the Member of Parliament for Whitney and the former prime minster, announced that he had stood down as an MP. This was obviously big news, but the reporting of Mr Cameron’s announcement—as is usually the case with MPs that stand down—did not mention an utterly bizarre fact about Members of Parliament in the UK: they cannot resign.

Under a resolution of the House of Commons, dated 2 March 1624, it was held that “a man, after he is duly chosen, cannot relinquish”. The convention previous to this was that MPs could not resign, although Parliament did occasionally order by-elections in the cases of members that were incurably ill or infirm.

On 30 December 1680, another resolution of the House of Commons was passed. It said: “Resolved, Nemine contradicente . That no member of this house shall accept any office, or place or profit, from the Crown, without the leave of this House, or any promise of any

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll