header-logo header-logo

14 October 2016 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 7718 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

A resigning matter

nlj_7718_backpage

Athelstane Aamodt examines the wonderfully British way in which an MP must leave Parliament

On 12 September David Cameron, the Member of Parliament for Whitney and the former prime minster, announced that he had stood down as an MP. This was obviously big news, but the reporting of Mr Cameron’s announcement—as is usually the case with MPs that stand down—did not mention an utterly bizarre fact about Members of Parliament in the UK: they cannot resign.

Under a resolution of the House of Commons, dated 2 March 1624, it was held that “a man, after he is duly chosen, cannot relinquish”. The convention previous to this was that MPs could not resign, although Parliament did occasionally order by-elections in the cases of members that were incurably ill or infirm.

On 30 December 1680, another resolution of the House of Commons was passed. It said: “Resolved, Nemine contradicente . That no member of this house shall accept any office, or place or profit, from the Crown, without the leave of this House, or any promise of any

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll