header-logo header-logo

Rethinking general counsel

01 July 2010
Issue: 7424 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

General counsel (GCs) need to measure their performance and commercial value in order to gain the wider business influence they seek.

General counsel (GCs) need to measure their performance and commercial value in order to gain the wider business influence they seek.

Research by Nabarro LLP among GCs and CEOs over the past year found nearly one in seven GCs feel it is not particularly important that the in-house legal team should add commercial value to the business. None of the CEOs agreed.

Most GCs expressed a desire to reach the top of their companies in terms of board influence and involvement in strategic planning and development of commercial opportunities. The research showed they need to measure their value and demonstrate it in order to succeed.

However, less than a third of GCs use a formal performance measurement system.

Jonathan Warne, partner at Nabarro, says: “Measuring value is often seen as a challenging process for an in-house legal team.

“There may be concerns about resourcing, the introduction of bureaucracy or inadequate returns. Our conversations with GCs and experts in the field suggest it need not be that way.

“Simple and practical approaches and systems can be introduced to clarify objectives, improve performance and measure value. Such tools should make it easier to run an in-house legal department, and may also make it simpler to identify areas in which GCs and other senior in-house lawyers can attain leadership.”
 

Issue: 7424 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll