header-logo header-logo

Rethinking prison for the 21st century

23 October 2024
Issue: 8091 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Judges could place criminals under house arrest instead of sending them to prison, under a major overhaul of sentencing policy

Lord Chancellor Shabana Mahmood launched an independent sentencing review this week into alternative approaches to criminal justice and the use of non-custodial sentences as a means to end the prisons crisis. Chaired by former justice secretary David Gauke, it will look at evidence from the US and other countries on what works, including technology to place offenders in a ‘prison outside prison’.

The review will look into potential rehabilitation programmes, review the impact of short custodial sentences, look at what happens to offenders on release, and consider specific sentencing for offences committed against women and girls.

Gauke said the review would ‘explore what punishment and rehabilitation should look like in the 21st century’.

The launch coincided with the early release of 1,100 prisoners serving five-year sentences or above, in order to free up prison places. The prison population has roughly doubled in the past 30 years, while nearly 90% of prisoners go on to reoffend.

Lawyers welcomed the review, which is due to report back to the Lord Chancellor by spring 2025.

Sam Townend KC, chair of the Bar Council, said: ‘One of the real drags on seeking to get the Crown Court backlogs down and to ensure swift efficient justice has been the mismatch of ever heavier prison sentences and inadequate prison places to meet the imposed demand.

‘Measures to speed up the Crown Courts have previously been thwarted due to the lack of prison spaces.’

Law Society president Richard Atkinson said it was ‘high time for an examination of alternatives to the use of custody’ but added that court backlogs and a lack of lawyers also caused prison overcrowding.

Pavan Dhaliwal, chief executive of criminal justice charity Revolving Doors, said: ‘Far too many people are in overcrowded prisons on hugely costly and ineffective short sentences not because they pose a danger to society, but because their health and social needs—relating to substance misuse, mental health, homelessness and for many women, domestic abuse—remain unmet.’ 

Issue: 8091 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll